Pentecostals; A continuing Wave or Dying ripple
For close to a century, the pentecostal wave has washed against the beaches of North America and indeed the world. Will that continue? Or has the force of this storm been spent? Has the power of this movement been absorbed by the surrounding currents? Has the pentecostal church already has served its usefulness by introducing a fresh and deepened understanding of the Holy Spirit?
As a pentecostal I resist the notion that this movement will now lapse now only to maintain a tradition or appear only in history texts. However if the pentecostal message is to continue impacting the church and the world we will need to moth ball our religious nostalgia, replace our fading memories and dying dreams with a vigorous analysis of what pentecostal theology and ministry is and develop a vigorous strategy.
A child of the 20th century
No other movement within the Christian church symbolizes the
twentieth century as does the pentecostal wave. Bursting on the scene
this religious phenomenon has worked its way into the very fabric of the
western culture. In fact it built from ideas, controversies and
spiritual interests common to the end of the nineteenth and the early
twentieth century.
The North American pentecostal church grew in a culture which
affirmed Judeo-Christianity. It was the foundation on which our culture
was managed. This view allowed the various sectors of society to work in
relative harmony without the clash of social discord we now experience
in this age of secularism and pluralism.
In the early years of this century mainline Protestantism was caught
by the debate of whether or not the Bible was the Word of God or Jesus
was the Son of God. During this modernist/fundamentalist debate
Pentecostals, in preaching the Bible as true and Jesus as the Christ,
attracted many who were discomfited with the increased liberalism in
their churches.
Growing interest in the work and person Holy Spirit flowed out of
the 19th century and provided the context in which the pentecostal
movement was born. Books were written, conferences held and world
renowned preachers--including Dwight L. Moody--pressed Christians with
the need to "walk in the Spirit." Thus as pentecostal preachers gave
insight and practical evidence of the power of the Spirit, hungry
believers responded and the pentecostal wave rose.
The Banks Overflowed
In the early 1960s, Anglican minister, Father Bennett helped to
trigger the charismatic movement. The banks of Pentecostalism overflowed
as the message of the Spirit's fullness worked its way into the streams
of mainline protestants and Catholics. The popularity of pentecostal
worship and theology provided an acceptance of the pentecostal
distinctive which up to that point was regarded by many as being
aberrant, if not heretical. For the last twenty five years mainline
pentecostal groups have both sustained and been sustained by the
popularity of the charismatic movement.
Today that scene is changing. The issues are different. Will
Pentecostals identify the real enemies of the Gospel and engage in the
battle? Or will we stay with the old analysis, refusing to accept the
battle of this generation? If we are committed to honest evaluation and
prepared to fight the battles of this generation it requires that we
first identify the enemy.
Secularism
Secularism is that enemy. In short, secularism is a denial of the
role of the transcendent in all of life. While a large majority of North
Americans continue to believe in a personal God and the divinity of
Jesus Christ, our government, educational systems, to name only two,
operate on the basis that while people may continue to practice their
faith, the idea of God is a private idea with no right to help shape our
laws or culture.
This shift away from acknowledging that life flows from God and is
to be lived under obedience to God became obvious in the 1960s. It was a
complete reversal from the historic understanding that Judeo-Christian
ideals were foundational to our social norms and legal assumptions.
Traditionally, Pentecostals have seen their prime foe to be liberal
Protestantism and Catholicism. Today, while we continue to oppose
liberal Protestantism, it is less of an issue as evangelicals are more
confident with their biblical views. The "battle for the Bible," has
been waged and won. As well there is evidence that liberal Protestantism
is failing to meet core spiritual needs or to attract the emerging
generation.
Relations with the catholic church are less antagonistic. In facing
secularism we see what we have in common with them; belief in a personal
God, the divinity of Jesus Christ and the Bible as the Word of God.
While we will continue to strongly disagree with their notion of grace
and forgiveness and issues like the role of the mother of Jesus, we
increasingly find ourselves in the same corner battling issues like
abortion, prayer in the schools and pornography. As well, in contrast to
other evangelicals, Pentecostals have a closer tie with those Catholics
who have come into their "pentecostal experience."
Thus the old battles with mainline protestants and Catholics no
longer dominate. What is at stake for Pentecostals is the battle for
biblical faith in our culture in the face of secularism. While we will
continue to press for vibrant, Bible believing faith over against
protestant liberalism and assert the nature of God's grace as the only
means of salvation over against traditional catholic dogma, the real
enemy is dominant secularism which attempts to stamp out biblical faith
by isolating it from shaping our culture or having a voice.
However while we see secularism as the dominant force pressing from
without, there are internal factors from within which call for our
response. These can easily diminish the force of the pentecostal wave.
Wile are others which could be identified, here I will note seven.
The Middle Class
Pentecostals have climbed the social and economic rungs into the
middle class. Pentecostalism, traditionally, found a broad acceptance
among those on the lower level of the social/economic ladder. Thus it
was convenient to preach on the evil of wealth, worldliness and
affluence when only a few in the church got more than an hourly wage.
Today, it is more difficult to preach about the worldliness of wealth.
All one needs to do is examine the parking lots of our churches during
the Sunday morning service!
While wealth and worldliness need not necessarily be linked our view
of wealth is cause for concern. Some say it’s an evidence of God's
blessing. That may be true. That however can lead to the next line:
"since our wealth is evidence of God's blessing, money is God's means of
demonstrating His approval and therefore what we are doing must also be
met with His approval. And poverty is evidence of His disapproval"
This feeds the building of empires. The down side is that those with
newly earned wealth quickly forget their roots. And the poor will be
reluctant to walk into our churches and for sure, will receive few
invitations for Sunday lunch. Wealth has a way of forming spiritual
cataracts, blinding us from the despair and predicament of others.
Preserving the Status Quo
The danger of success is the straight jacket of the status quo; a
belief that the surest way to retain blessings is to resist change. I
recall when the very name, "pentecostal," conjured up scenes of crazies
rolling on the floor and hanging from the chandeliers. (I always wanted
to see the latter, but somehow missed any display of such acrobatic
skill!)
Today with larger numbers, increased leadership roles in mainstream
evangelical circles, respectable church facilities, successful use of
the electronic media we are now considered part of the religious
establishment. The danger is when we attempt to preserve the newly found
status. It traps us into guarding old positions, shelving creative
ideas and forcing younger leaders to accept the old ways. And if younger
leaders aspire higher levels of leadership they are forced to pay the
high price of conventionality and mediocrity. Risk taking is out. The
old ways in.
There is a second aspect to the status quo and that is a reaction to
losing a denominational's position as the sole proprietor of the
historic pentecostal message. When a doctrine, like speaking in tongues,
is modified by Charismatics, the reaction by the historic pentecostal
groups may be to withdraw into sectarianism. The same has been true with
those who have emphasized "kingdom" theology. In recent years some,
within our denominations, have preached increasingly on Christ's kingdom
in ways which cut across the grain of some of our traditional views.
Instead of examining those ideas for what they are worth we react,
ostracizing both the people and their ideas.
Tongues as the Test
I am grateful for the biblical teaching on the nature and place of tongues in worship and life. My concern is not whether or not speaking in tongues is biblical. I believe it is. Instead it is this. Will we make this the prime litmus test of whether or not one is truly "pentecostal." Central to the historic pentecostal movement has been an understanding of the nature of God's power, manifested through the church in holiness, healing, salvation and a risk taking courage of going anywhere for Christ. We must encourage people to open to the Holy Spirit and biblical manifestations. Yet to make tongues the prime feature of what it means to be pentecostal is, in my view, to limit the message of God's power in life. And that would be affirm the opposite of those who led this movement.
Trapped by the Surrounding Culture
Reinhold Niebuhr in the classic Christ and Culture identifies one
role of religion in culture and that to prophetically call it to
obedience. This Pentecostals have done but today we are in deep danger
of simply becoming a mirror of our surrounding culture reflecting it
instead of a being a candle, providing guidance. Our values, style,
buildings and programs are too often reworked versions of what has
already been done in "the world." That doesn't make it wrong but it can
lead us to the unconscious conclusion that to be successful it must fit a
certain pattern.
This can be seen by the interest in influencing our government. I
believe that such activity is biblical and necessary. However I sense
that one dominant reason that many of our people want to influence
government is because other interest groups are becoming so strident in
pressing their views. As we witness their activities and successes we
ask for the same influence.
Dependency on the Charismatic Wave
As the charismatic wave surged through the seventies, the pentecostal church grew as people were attracted to the theology, worship and freedom attributed to the Holy Spirit. Although the pentecostal movement had spawned the charismatic wave, the wider interest in a more experience oriented religion made the pentecostal church more attractive. In this sense the traditional pentecostal churches rode the new wave. Today that wave is cresting. And like all movements, it will diminish in size and intensity. This will in turn affect pentecostal denominations. The choice is to ignore the surrounding cultural realities and continue, entrenched in our ways or to do careful analysis of the situation and who we are and then be creative in developing strategies for growth and ministries and design effective forms of worship and witness .
Definition of worldliness
With our roots in the holiness movements of the 19th century, early Pentecostalism was clearly against certain forms of entertainment and behaviour. The typical issues were smoking, alcoholic beverages, movies and dancing. As well, involvement in such activities as politics were seen as "worldly" and therefore unacceptable for a believer. Today we are having difficulty in defining "worldliness." Traditionally we saw it as doing certain things, now we realize it is anything one does outside of the reign of Jesus Christ, including what is done for and within the church. For sure our church buildings look like and our entertainment sounds like what we see and hear in the world. So what do we do? Walk away from defining worldliness because we are becoming so much like the world? Or do we fall back into the trap of legalism when worldliness was more a reflection of sectarianism than it was of biblical exegesis? I pray not. But we do need a biblical definition of worldliness.
Avoidance of Social Issues
As the Social Gospel emerged in the early 1900s many evangelicals
and certainly early Pentecostals were soured on becoming involved in
social issues. The reason being was that most Social Gospel advocates
were rooted in theological liberalism. This convinced Pentecostals that
they should therefore have nothing to do with social issues. The
opposite was advanced. Save souls for eternity, that's all that really
matters.
Thus both our ability to analyze and respond to social issues was
retarded. Now that we are concerned about social issues--usually
confined to moral/ethical issues like abortion and pornography--we
struggle to make sense of what is going on and what should be done. Thus
when we do get involved it may be done with a lack of sensitivity and
skill. If it is done in the full glare of the media eye, it is highly
magnified and often distorted.
What do we have to offer? As a pentecostal, I look with hope to this
new decade, as the Lord delays His coming. I have noted the primary foe
of this age, secularism and those issues which can neutralize our
spiritual effectiveness. I do so with a conviction that there is no need
for the wave to become a ripple. What will it require?
Affirm the Transcendent
The rationalism of the 19th century was snuffing out the life of the
church. The most fundamental aspect of the pentecostal message was that
God is alive, engaging His people by His Spirit in life. Speaking in
tongues was important as an expression of that power. At the core,
however, of the pentecostal message was God's faithful witness in power
in meeting needs and empowering His people.
While we have been accepted within the broader evangelical church
stream there is a danger that we could be trapped into being like others
for increased acceptance. That will not serve the church. Each
denomination has and is used of God to bless His church. But if
Pentecostals attempt to reformat their ministry for reasons other than
biblical outreach the essence of spiritual power will erode.
Affirm Joy in Worship
A dominant symbol of Holy Spirit worship is joy. I admit that too
often our services have lacked thought and order. But they were
characterized by praise. The challenge is to design creative pentecostal
worship which is authentic and not just a reworking of the past.
Included is an acceptance of new forms of music, a instituting of older
forms and the inclusion of Bible texts in music and recitation. But that
takes thoughtful planning.
There are times I feel that as the pastor and I walk to the
platform, he is scrambling in his mind to decide what songs to sing and
how to order the service. We must be careful not to think that because
our worship often has the appearance of informality that sloppiness is
therefore acceptable. Some pentecostal churches have not varied their
form of worship for decades. And yet the needs of our people have
changed.
Affirming Lostness
We all have been influenced by the sciences of psychology and
sociology. While they have greatly assisted us in understanding the
human condition, central to our theology is an understanding of the
nature of sin and salvation. Much of our ministry time is taken up in
dealing with the sins of our people. And since the majority of ministry
is pastoral, our focus is on the immediate needs and feelings of those
we shepherd. What is forgotten is the nature of eternity and thus the
eternal consequence of a life outside of Christ. Sin is not just
sinning. Sin is to be cut off from God. Eternal lostness can be
camouflaged as we are reluctant to be characterized as the hell fire and
brimstone preachers. As we are surrounded by immediate, pressing needs,
we may fail to remind our people of the reality of a eternity apart
from Christ.
In short, humans are lost now and forever apart from the grace of
our risen Lord. As we build our churches and serve the needs of our
families, members and those of the surrounding community, the deep
consciousness of this reality, lostness, is pushed to the side. While we
attempt to bring justice to the unborn and curb the evils of
pornography along with other pressing social evils, do we allot
sufficient time, human resources and budget to reach our community,
whose members are forever lost unless they know The Christ.
To do battle against secularism and to avoid the neutralizing forces
within the church, it will require an biblical examination of the
essence of the pentecostal message.
Religious observers may predict that this pentecostal, twentieth
century wave has peaked and conclude it will soon become a ripple. While
we understand that God works within the context of culture and time,
His ways are eternal and His will ongoing. Storms will come and go.
Tides will rise and fall. Waves will wash back and forth on the beaches,
but the sea will continue to do its work. God's will to empower His
people has not changed. May we ride the wave of His workings in this
generation. Let the waves roll on.