Canadian and American Evangelicals: Viva la difference!
Many assume that evangelicals in Canada are a carbon copy of those in the United States. While there are striking similarities there are profound differences.These differences are not over essentials such as the authority of Scripture or the Divinity of Christ but rather in the way we respond to our surrounding culture.
The simple reason is that Canada is different. Take, for example,
the fact that though Canada is geographically larger, Canada's
population is only one
tenth that of the U.S.A. Politically, we continue in the British
Parliamentary system, in which elected representatives must vote along
party lines. This is
in sharp contrast to the U.S system, which allows for free vote.
Canada is officially bilingual. In Canada, ethnic groups are encouraged
to retain their
uniqueness as part of the "mosaic", while in the U.S. the strong
identity of being "American" reinforces the "melting pot" notion.
Militarily, we consider our role to be that of peace making. In real
terms, we aren't big enough to hurt any one. And our nationalism is
often described negatively, in terms of who we
aren't ("I'm not an American"). These differences shape the way many
evangelical Protestants view their role in Canadian life.
That is not to say that Canadian evangelicals are at odds with their American counterparts. Rather, Canadian evangelicals respond in ways which are reflective of their surrounding culture and interpret their calling in ways which are consistent with their national character.
One such issue is how we as evangelicals can be faithful to the
Scriptural call to be "in the world yet not of the world." Evangelicals
who were shaped by
reacting to the liberal/fundamentalist controversy are today trying
to make sense of what it means for someone with a Bible(c)believing
faith to live in and
influence a secular and hostile world.
For much of this century the more fundamentalist wing of the
evangelical community abstained from involvement in managing society for
two reasons.
Leadership in such areas as government, business and education,
could be left, our side thought, to those from mainline churches since
they shared our
affirmation that biblical morality was good for Canada. There was no
basic conflict between the sides since both adhered to a
Judeo-Christian foundation to life. This left our side free to pursue
our calling, armed with the attitude: "It's really the individual who
needs to be saved. Since Christ's coming is just
around the corner, our only interest is to get people ready for
eternity." Salvation became a preoccupation with individualistic "souls"
instead of all of God's creation.
Today we are faced with this dilemma: Christ has not returned and
the Judeo-Christian foundation of our nation is crumbling. Our children
are being raised in a world that is hostile to the Gospel and even to
the value of human life. So what are we to do?
My pilgrimage is similar to others, especially those with
Anabaptist, Holiness or Charismatic roots. We are faced now with the
task of having to construct
a biblical framework in order to communicate God's Word in this
culture, which opts for radical secularism, hedonism, individualism and
materialism.
But how do we engage in biblical evangelism and loving service
without being trapped by the errors and inadequacies of the Social
Gospel?
We realize that, while we continue to call people to personal faith
in Jesus Christ, narrowing that call to some form of individualism means
not only shortÂȘchanging the Gospel but also making it difficult for
Christians to engage redemptively in the service of God's coming kingdom
of righteousness.
The Reformed community has enabled those of us working with the
Evangelical Fellowship of Canada (a sister organization of the National
Association of
Evangelicals in the U.S.A.), to understand more deeply the distinct
role of churches and the comprehensive responsibility of Christians in a
"post-Christian" era. And for this I am most grateful. The Canadian
Council of Christian Reformed Churches joined EFC in 1979.
As an association we endeavour to help our members to understand,
and respond in a biblical way, to themany vital issues our country
faces. For example,EFC's The Declaration on Human Life was written to
set a confessional standard on the issue of abortion. This past year EFC
analyzed and developed responses to national moral/ethical concerns,
working in tandem with the Canadian Conference of Catholic Bishops, the
Mennonite Central Committee, Citizens for Public Justice and other
groups. EFC's Social Action Commission along with its task forces on
Evangelism and the Family seek to inform, educate and present Christian
alternatives to the profound problems of this age.
The danger is that we become reactionary(c)(c)instead of being
redemptive by working in community, promoting authentic cooperation as
an expression of our unity in Him. There are encouraging signs that
Canadian evangelicals are working together, refusing to be trapped by
narrow sectarianism, giving expression to our Lord as the Way, Truth and
Life even in the face of idolatry and evil.